The second factor is the implementation of the chipset on the motherboard you own. The 889A is superior to the 883, for example. The first factor in the equation is the model chipset itself. You see, there's more to this issue than just black and white. I'm sure everyone who has posted a review regarding Realtek audio chipsets is correct. I can always just leave the XP systems at the earlier versions. As it is, if they tweak stuff for Win 7, they sometimes goof up something in Windows XP, and that kinda sucks.īut it is what it is and it works ok for now I guess. I wish that they would optimize code for each chipset on each platform. Regardless, I'm not that happy about the combined codec download and codebase. Given how inconsistent Creative drivers have been over the years, it's no wonder that most people are not upset about the change in the way sound is processed in Vista and Win 7 and the push for onboard sound has taken hold so substantially. Given that Microsoft has pretty much ripped out the sound code and rewrote it all in software, and that multi-core systems are in place in many homes, onboard sound can give very, very good results compared to dedicated cards. These seem to cause trouble on my Windows XP systems but help on my Windows 7 system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |